Skip to main content
Changelog

What's new at OptimAIze

Every feature, crawler, and schema generator we ship — in one timeline.

  1. 2026-06-12v2.4.0BlogSEO

    Blog engine v2 + related posts

    Articles now auto-tag during generation, sitemap freshness signals for new posts, and a related-posts module at the bottom of every article.

  2. 2026-06-08v2.3.0Programmatic SEOContent

    Programmatic SEO expansion

    Shipped /ai-engines, /locations, and /glossary route families. Net +120 indexable pages with JSON-LD, FAQ schema, and internal linking.

  3. 2026-05-28v2.2.0MonitoringGEO

    AI Citation Tracker beta

    Live monitoring of brand mentions in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Weekly email reports with trend lines.

  4. 2026-05-15v2.1.0ToolsAgents

    ai-plugin.json generator

    New tool that writes an AI-plugin manifest for any domain. Helps agent frameworks discover your site as an actionable endpoint.

  5. 2026-05-01v2.0.0GEOScoring

    Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) scoring

    Replaced the legacy SEO score with a dedicated GEO score that measures AI-readiness: llms.txt, AI crawler permissions, entity clarity, and schema coverage.

  6. 2026-04-10v1.9.0i18nSEO

    Multilingual launch — 12 languages

    Full hreflang support for English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, Italian, Chinese, Russian, Arabic, Japanese, Persian, and Hindi.

  7. 2026-03-22v1.8.0IndexingPerformance

    IndexNow + Bing auto-ping

    Every new programmatic page and blog post is automatically submitted to Bing via IndexNow, cutting indexation time from weeks to hours.

  8. 2026-03-01v1.7.0SchemaAEO

    FAQ schema + Speakable markup

    Added FAQPage and Speakable JSON-LD to all guides and tools. Improves voice-assistant and AI Overview surfacing.

  9. 2026-02-10v1.6.0ExportAgency

    PDF audit reports

    One-click export of a branded PDF with scores, issues, generated files, and a task checklist. Built for agencies sharing audits with clients.

  10. 2026-01-15v1.5.0ToolsGEO

    llms.txt generator v1

    The first public version of our llms.txt generator. Crawls your site, infers structure, and outputs a deploy-ready machine-readable manifest.

  11. 2025-11-20v1.4.0CrawlersGEO

    PerplexityBot + ClaudeBot coverage

    Expanded AI crawler detection and robots.txt rules to cover PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, and anthropic-ai user agents.

  12. 2025-09-05v1.3.0AEOScoring

    Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) score

    Added a second score focused on answer-first content, FAQ schema, and Speakable markup. Complements the GEO score for full AI-search coverage.

  13. 2025-06-18v1.2.0ToolsSchema

    JSON-LD + robots.txt generators

    Shipped standalone tools for JSON-LD schema and AI-aware robots.txt. Every output is validated against Google's rich-results test.

  14. 2025-04-01v1.1.0LaunchScanner

    Free scanner public beta

    Opened the free GEO scanner to the public. First 1,000 audits revealed that 71% of sites had no machine-readable summary at all.

  15. 2025-01-10v1.0.0Launch

    OptimAIze launch

    Initial release of the GEO and AEO scanner. Six files generated per scan: llms.txt, robots.txt, sitemap.xml, JSON-LD, ai-plugin.json, and FAQ schema.

Want the next update first?

Follow the blog or run a free scan to see what the current version of OptimAIze recommends for your site.

Read release notes as changes, not outcome promises

A release note describes what changed in the product. It does not prove a lift in traffic, guarantee citation placement or establish adoption by an AI vendor. Check whether a change applies to the tool or workflow you use, then compare the current result with your retained baseline.

Verify a change on your own published site

After updating generated files or recommended markup, inspect the live domain and representative URLs. Cache behavior, CMS settings and deployment permissions can differ from a preview. Keep your previous configuration and note the date so regressions can be reversed and changes can be compared fairly.

Keep a record of what changed

Save the original URL, input, date and evidence before editing. Verify the deployed page or file, document the changes and repeat the same checks. Separate technical validity, correct answer representation and qualified visits; none should be used as a substitute for the others.

Evidence and next actions

CheckEvidence to retainAction
AccessPublic status and useful response bodyFix barriers before rewriting
AccuracyVisible facts and supporting primary sourcesCorrect unsupported statements
MarkupValid syntax that matches the pageRemove invented reviews and properties
OutcomeComparable responses and referral activityReport observations without guarantees

Implementation checklist

  • Use the tool or guide matching the problem.
  • Verify important facts against current primary documentation.
  • Keep private data out of published files and support requests.
  • Check changes on the real domain.
  • Retain comparable before-and-after evidence.

A repeatable workflow

  1. 1
    Establish a baseline

    Save the page URL, date, language, target market and exact questions before editing. Record what the page actually says and what each tested answer cites; a mention without a source link is not a citation.

  2. 2
    Make one coherent change

    Resolve the clearest failure first, then check the published page rather than only an editor preview. Keep an implementation log so unrelated redesigns, campaigns or product changes are not mistaken for the effect of this work.

  3. 3
    Repeat and compare

    Repeat the same questions and technical checks after deployment. Keep engines and measurement conditions consistent, report sample size, and inspect answer accuracy alongside citations. A single response is not a stable ranking.

More questions answered

Does this guarantee an AI citation?
No. A crawlable, accurate page can still be omitted. Retrieval, source selection and generated answers vary between products and requests; these checks improve the evidence available, not guarantee placement.
How do I tell whether an improvement worked?
Compare like-for-like checks and retain the underlying evidence. Track correct brand mentions, source-linked citations and qualified referral visits separately. Do not call a technical score a traffic forecast or attribute every change to one edit.